On 10/20/2016 09:12 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On 10/20/2016 02:19 AM, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
+ cdns,tslch-ns = <4>;
+
+ partition@qspi-boot {
+ /* 8MB for raw data. */
+ label = "Flash 0 Raw Data";
+ reg = <0x0 0x800000>;
+ };
+
+ partition@qspi-rootfs {
+ /* 120MB for jffs2 data. */
+ label = "Flash 0 jffs2 Filesystem";
+ reg = <0x800000 0x7800000>;
+ };
+ };
+};
+
What is the current preferred way of handling the partitions?
This doesn't fit my Sockit configuration for example. So I would always
have to patch the devicetree.
I'm not 100% sure on this. Graham, do you have any insight?
Well, strictly speaking, these partitions are only for the socdk, the
Altera dev kit. Our sample designs and file systems expect this layout.
Therefore, these partitions are not required for any other dev kits, and
can probably be left out.
Or, Steffen, if you have a standard layout you'd like to see, then put
that in there.
I think some people will have to patch the layout regardless.
-Graham
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
