On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:15PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 05:52:50PM +0100, Luis.Oliveira@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > - is_slave = device_property_read_bool(&pdev->dev, "isslave"); > > Which tree is this based on? I cant see the existing isslave property in > mainline HEAD (commit 29fbff8698fc0ac1). Same surprise here. Because I likely would have NAKed the binding. Why is it needed? Doesn't the driver allow to be master/slave on the same bus?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
