On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 05:52:50PM +0100, Luis.Oliveira@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > - is_slave = device_property_read_bool(&pdev->dev, "isslave"); Which tree is this based on? I cant see the existing isslave property in mainline HEAD (commit 29fbff8698fc0ac1). > +#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI > + is_slave = device_property_read_bool(&pdev->dev, "is-slave"); > +#endif This ifdef is broken. At least for arm64, a single kernel image can be booted with either ACPI or DT. We need separate accessors for DT and ACPI to handle these differently, or you need to explicitly check whether or not you have ACPI or DT at runtime. Thanks, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
