On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:20:39AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > + regulators {
> > + compatible = "maxim,max14577-regulator";
> > +
> > + safeout_reg: safeout@1 {
> The name of the node (not the label:safeout_reg) usually depicts the
> type of device, so 'regulator@0' and 'regulator@1'. However, I'm
> unsure how this works when these nodes are encapsulated by an
> overarching 'regulators' parent node.
> Perhaps Mark can answer this?
The name there is meaningless, the DT convention is as you describe and
applies to any node but equally well it's just a convention and I
struggle to see the value it adds. Having something that humans find
helpful is just as well.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
