On 12/09/16 13:59, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 01:30:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:44:07PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:36:15PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: >>>> The changes in arm64's <asm/arch_timer.h> are going to conflict with >>>> some cleanup [1,2] that just landed in the arm64 for-next/core branch. >>>> >>>> Could you please rebase atop of that? >>> >>> Well, we should figure out what tree this is going through first. There >>> are a mixture of arm, arm64, driver and dts changes here and not all >>> of it is carrying the appropriate acks for me to queue it. >> >> Given that mix, I had assumed that this would all go through the arm64 >> tree -- I see that Rob has already acked the binding, and I'm happy to >> give my ack for the driver once that's in shape. > > Now I see that I'd missed the arch/arm changes in patch 4, which lack a > relevant ack. > > Given that, I don't know what to suggest. I wouldn't mind delaying patch 4 until it gets acked by RMK, as it doesn't impact the functionality. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
