On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:52 AM, "Andersson, Björn" <Bjorn.Andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/25/13 4:14 PM, "Stephen Warren" <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> +Optional subnode-properties: >>> +- qcom,function: A name of the function to be muxed to the specified >>> + pins. Possible values are listed below. >> >>Are "pins" and "functions" generic enough now that they don't need a >>vendor prefix? Both those property names are certainly mentioned in >>pinctrl-bindings.txt. > > I've missed that these where in pinconf-generic. I based > msm_dt_subnode_to_map > on the tegra implementation and made changes to support pinconf-generic, > which > now seems identical with pinconf_generic_dt_subnode_to_map. > I'll use that directly instead. OK that's essentially one of my comments on patch 1/3 addressed, so looking forward to see v2. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
