On 02/09/16 23:27, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 09/02/2016 12:07 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Rob,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 08:06:43AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
[...]
+
+TI-SCI Client Device Node:
+========================
+
+Client nodes refer to the required TI-SCI device using the "ti,sci"
property.
As I mentioned for power domains, for clients that are self contained
(i.e. a single function) I think the should be child nodes.
Thanks for the feedback. I think we should be able to do that and also
assume you have no further improvements you'd like to see here.
Looking at current Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt
-> it makes sense to stick along the same lines as you mentioned.
Dave, Tero: do you guys have any objections?
No objections, I think this is a logical move.
Yea, sounds like a valid change. I believe you are going to post a new
version so I can modify the clock driver also accordingly?
-Tero
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
