Rob, On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 08:06:43AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: [...] >> + >> +TI-SCI Client Device Node: >> +======================== >> + >> +Client nodes refer to the required TI-SCI device using the "ti,sci" property. > > As I mentioned for power domains, for clients that are self contained > (i.e. a single function) I think the should be child nodes. > Thanks for the feedback. I think we should be able to do that and also assume you have no further improvements you'd like to see here. Looking at current Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt -> it makes sense to stick along the same lines as you mentioned. Dave, Tero: do you guys have any objections? --- Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
