On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:17:57PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> The change corrects an example in device tree documentation section,
> because button/key device nodes don't contain reg property there is
> no need to declare unit-address, and address and size cell properties
> are also redundant.
>
> At the moment a compilation of the hypothetical original example
> should produce W=1 level warnings, and it is better to stop spreading
> misusage of the polled gpio keys device tree binding through this
> example.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@xxxxxxxxx>
Applied, thank you.
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys-polled.txt | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys-polled.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys-polled.txt
> index 95d0fb1..4d9a371 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys-polled.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys-polled.txt
> @@ -34,11 +34,10 @@ Example nodes:
>
> gpio_keys_polled {
> compatible = "gpio-keys-polled";
> - #address-cells = <1>;
> - #size-cells = <0>;
> poll-interval = <100>;
> autorepeat;
> - button@21 {
> +
> + button21 {
> label = "GPIO Key UP";
> linux,code = <103>;
> gpios = <&gpio1 0 1>;
> --
> 2.8.1
>
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
