The change corrects an example in device tree documentation section,
because button/key device nodes don't contain reg property there is
no need to declare unit-address, and address and size cell properties
are also redundant.
At the moment a compilation of the hypothetical original example
should produce W=1 level warnings, and it is better to stop spreading
misusage of the polled gpio keys device tree binding through this
example.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys-polled.txt | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys-polled.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys-polled.txt
index 95d0fb1..4d9a371 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys-polled.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys-polled.txt
@@ -34,11 +34,10 @@ Example nodes:
gpio_keys_polled {
compatible = "gpio-keys-polled";
- #address-cells = <1>;
- #size-cells = <0>;
poll-interval = <100>;
autorepeat;
- button@21 {
+
+ button21 {
label = "GPIO Key UP";
linux,code = <103>;
gpios = <&gpio1 0 1>;
--
2.8.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
