On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 03:42:31PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:35:52AM +0400, Valentine wrote: > > On 11/30/2013 12:14 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > >Hello, > > > > > >On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:06:05AM +0400, Valentine wrote: > > >>On 11/08/2013 04:09 PM, Valentine Barshak wrote: > > >> > > >>Tejun, > > >>are you OK with taking this? > > > > > >Yeah, the stat part looks okay to me. How the two should be routed? > > >Both through libata or should I just take the first one? > > > > I'm not sure about that. I'm more concerned about the first one. > > But I wouldn't mind if you take both. > > Applied the first one to libata/for-3.14. Are people happy with the > second one? If so, I'll put route that through libata/for-3.14 too. Hi, Assuming that the second one is " [PATCH V3 2/2] dt: Document sata_rcar bindings" then from my point of view it would be ideal if you took it. However, it seems that there is still some discussion on the contents between Valentine and Kumar Gala. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
