On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 09:36 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:14:10PM +0930, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Since v1: > > > > Rob: I haven't added your Acked-by here as I've made the following changes and > > wanted to get your input: > > > > * Remove interrupt-controller as an optional property > > * Defer to interrupt-controller bindings document for sub-node properties > > > > I had a discussion with Joel about whether the interrupt-controller capability > > should be optional and the conclusion was that it should always be configured > > by the driver. This makes an optional interrupt-controller property feel > > redundant (and possibly inaccurate if left out) so I've removed it. > I don't follow. What do you mean byt "configured by the driver". If the > block supports interrupts, then it should be marked as an > interrupt-controller. It never should have been optional. The OS can > ignore the interrupt properties if it chooses. Right, clearly there was some confusion on my part. I will fix that up. Thanks for clarifying. Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
