Hi Matthias, On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 17:51 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 07/07/16 11:06, Dawei Chien wrote: > > This adds the thermal controller and auxadc nodes > > to the Mediatek MT2701 dtsi file. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dawei Chien <dawei.chien@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > This patch depned on: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9213545/ > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi > > index 2ac8b50..0834a23 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi > > @@ -77,6 +77,36 @@ > > #clock-cells = <0>; > > }; > > > > + thermal-zones { > > + cpu_thermal: cpu_thermal { > > + polling-delay-passive = <1000>; /* milliseconds */ > > + polling-delay = <1000>; /* milliseconds */ > > + > > + thermal-sensors = <&thermal 0>; > > + sustainable-power = <1000>; > > + > > + trips { > > + threshold: trip-point@0 { > > + temperature = <68000>; > > + hysteresis = <2000>; > > + type = "passive"; > > + }; > > + > > + target: trip-point@1 { > > + temperature = <85000>; > > + hysteresis = <2000>; > > + type = "passive"; > > + }; > > + > > + cpu_crit: cpu_crit@0 { > > + temperature = <115000>; > > + hysteresis = <2000>; > > + type = "critical"; > > + }; > > + }; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > timer { > > compatible = "arm,armv7-timer"; > > interrupt-parent = <&gic>; > > @@ -183,4 +213,17 @@ > > clocks = <&uart_clk>; > > status = "disabled"; > > }; > > + > > + thermal: thermal@1100b000 { > > + #thermal-sensor-cells = <0>; > > + compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-thermal"; > > + reg = <0 0x1100b000 0 0x1000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 70 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; > > + clocks = <&pericfg CLK_PERI_THERM>, <&pericfg CLK_PERI_AUXADC>; > > + clock-names = "therm", "auxadc"; > > + resets = <&pericfg 0x10>; > > + reset-names = "therm"; > > + mediatek,auxadc = <&auxadc>; > > + mediatek,apmixedsys = <&apmixedsys>; > > + }; > > }; > > > > what about: > status = "disabled"; ? Since thermal driver would protect our platform by shutdown method once SoC temperature over critical point, I prefer keep this rather than disabling, how do you think, thank you. BR, Dawei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
