Hi Rob, Michael, Russell
Cc Rob
What is the conclusion of this patch ?
We shouldn't add devm_of_clk_get() ? or I can continue ?
> Thank you for your feedback
>
> > > struct clk *clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
> > > {
> > > ...
> > > if (dev) {
> > > clk = __of_clk_get_by_name(dev->of_node, dev_id, con_id);
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > ...
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > I would like to select specific device_node.
> >
> > Do you have access to the struct device that you want to target? Can you
> > pass that device into either clk_get or devm_clk_get?
>
> If my understanding was correct, I think I can't.
> In below case, "sound_soc" has its *dev, but "cpu" and "codec" doesn't
> have *dev, it has node only. Thus, we are using of_clk_get() for these now.
>
> clk = of_clk_get(cpu, xxx);
> clk = of_clk_get(codec, xxx);
>
> sound_soc {
> ...
> cpu {
> ...
> => clocks = <&xxx>;
> };
> codec {
> ...
> => clocks = <&xxx>;
> };
> };
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
