On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Please help out to get this right, I think this could be confusing >> to users unless documented properly. I think the doc has some rough >> edges since I'm not the smartest in physics nor english at all times. > > Note that there is rather more substantial documentation in the > sysfs abi docs. > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio Yes I used that actually, for the magnetometer example. Thanks anyways! > That's not to say we shouldn't have better docs for the > binding, but rather that we should make sure they agree ;) Yes, this is mainly for establishing terminology, as the DT bindings are (in theory, mind you) a standards document used by other operating systems as well. There are some problems with the Linux implementation, primarily that it is "opt-in per driver" and I think it would make sense to try to enable it by default for any 3-axis 3D things and move all code to a central spot, if possible. I also think we should patch generic_buffer to make use of the mount matrix if it finds one. (I know, talk is cheap, show me the code, it's all on my TODO list.) Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
