On Saturday, July 9, 2016 11:25:19 AM CEST Wan Zongshun wrote: > On 2016年06月29日 23:27, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Saturday, June 25, 2016 6:37:20 PM CEST Wan Zongshun wrote: > >> +#define IRQ_WDT W90X900_IRQ(1) > >> +#define IRQ_WWDT W90X900_IRQ(2) > >> +#define IRQ_LVD W90X900_IRQ(3) > >> +#define IRQ_EXT0 W90X900_IRQ(4) > >> +#define IRQ_EXT1 W90X900_IRQ(5) > >> +#define IRQ_EXT2 W90X900_IRQ(6) > >> +#define IRQ_EXT3 W90X900_IRQ(7) > >> +#define IRQ_EXT4 W90X900_IRQ(8) > >> +#define IRQ_EXT5 W90X900_IRQ(9) > >> +#define IRQ_EXT6 W90X900_IRQ(10) > > > > I'd suggest dropping the list, the contents are now in the dts. > > Arnd, I will drop this file later, since old w90x900 plat still need it. Sure. > but I will remove the Macros related to nuc970 and avoid nuc970 > interrupt using those Macro. > > But I still need hack this irqs.h like below, since here NR_IRQS defined > and it is need for nuc970 irqchip driver. > > #if !defined(CONFIG_SOC_NUC900) > #define NR_IRQS (IRQ_ADC+1) > #else > #define NR_IRQS 62 > #endif Have you considered using CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ? That would avoid the need for setting NR_IRQS entirely, but may also require more work elsewhere. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
