Hi, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:22:33PM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote: > >> and also the fact that *in my case* the kernel does its job >> auto-detecting the PHY, I now also wonder how the kernel can >> use that info and what I get by adding the compatible string. > > I think the main rational was to document what chip the phy is to > people who don't have the hardware... > > You probably shouldn't delay your patch on this issue, document the > phy chip model in a comment? Will do that. > Also, check if it is actually an S varient or not, they have the same > phy-id.. ;) On the chip, I have 88E1318-NNB2 (PNN1230_3JW 1209 A0P TW). I will see if I can find more info. Cheers, a+ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
