Hi Chen-Yu, On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:01:53AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:15:55AM +0200, Bernhard Nortmann wrote: > >> Am 02.06.2016 um 10:16 schrieb Maxime Ripard: > >> >[...] > >> >Yes, everything that is shared with the banana-pro (which, judging > >> >from Bernhard, is pretty much everything but a GPIO) should be merged > >> >in the banapro DT. > >> > > >> >Maxime > >> > > >> > >> Don't take my word for granted, as I do not own this hardware or know it > >> particularly well. There is no doubt that "BPi-M1+" and "Banana Pro" are > >> very similar, but if in doubt the information form the wiki should be > >> verified. > > > > Hmmmm, ok. Chen-Yu, any input on this? You know the banana-pis much > > more than I do. > > I did a comparison of the "Banana Pro" vs the "BPi-M1+". > > The differences are similar to what we have with any other development > board, say the Cubietruck: > > - A different WiFi chip is used, and the BT part is not hooked up. > - Different GPIOs for external power regulator/switches > - Different GPIOs for LEDs > - Different peripherals exposed on the headers. > > IMO There's no need to merge or have a common .dtsi for the two boards. Ok. > They (and all the other development boards) look similar because > everyone is following the basic set by Allwinner's reference design, > like which MMC controller and pins are used for SD/MMC, which ones > are used for SDIO-based WiFi, and so on. > > I did a version completely from scratch using just the schematics: > > https://github.com/wens/linux/commits/bpi-m1-plus So, what do you mean by that? Do you have some comments on that patch, or should I merge it, and you'll post your additions on top of it? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
