On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:15:55AM +0200, Bernhard Nortmann wrote: >> Am 02.06.2016 um 10:16 schrieb Maxime Ripard: >> >[...] >> >Yes, everything that is shared with the banana-pro (which, judging >> >from Bernhard, is pretty much everything but a GPIO) should be merged >> >in the banapro DT. >> > >> >Maxime >> > >> >> Don't take my word for granted, as I do not own this hardware or know it >> particularly well. There is no doubt that "BPi-M1+" and "Banana Pro" are >> very similar, but if in doubt the information form the wiki should be >> verified. > > Hmmmm, ok. Chen-Yu, any input on this? You know the banana-pis much > more than I do. I did a comparison of the "Banana Pro" vs the "BPi-M1+". The differences are similar to what we have with any other development board, say the Cubietruck: - A different WiFi chip is used, and the BT part is not hooked up. - Different GPIOs for external power regulator/switches - Different GPIOs for LEDs - Different peripherals exposed on the headers. IMO There's no need to merge or have a common .dtsi for the two boards. They (and all the other development boards) look similar because everyone is following the basic set by Allwinner's reference design, like which MMC controller and pins are used for SD/MMC, which ones are used for SDIO-based WiFi, and so on. I did a version completely from scratch using just the schematics: https://github.com/wens/linux/commits/bpi-m1-plus Please ignore the last commit. It's just me playing with NTP support for GPS time. Regards ChenYu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
