Hello Rob, On 16-05-27 15:38:17, maitysanchayan@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 16-05-27 10:31:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday, May 27, 2016 12:03:01 PM CEST maitysanchayan@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > So if I understand correctly, the binding at the SoC level is fine. > > > Keeping that but removing the additional made-up properties, viz. below > > > > > > rom-revision: phandle to the on-chip ROM node > > > mscm: phandle to the MSCM CPU configuration node > > > nvmem-cells: phandles to two OCOTP child nodes ocotp_cfg0 and ocotp_cfg1 > > > nvmem-cell-names: should contain string names "cfg0" and "cfg1" > > > > > > would be fine? > > > > > > We would have something similar to here > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg80655.html > > > > > > but now with the DT binding under SoC bus. > > > > > > > > > You look up the OTP device as a syscon here, which seems odd since there > > is already an nvmem driver for it. Shouldn't you use the nvmem API for > > that? > > > > Arnd > > I need the following > > nvmem-cells: phandles to two OCOTP child nodes ocotp_cfg0 and ocotp_cfg1 > nvmem-cell-names: should contain string names "cfg0" and "cfg1" > > to be able to use the NVMEM consumer API. > > If I can put them at SoC node level then I certainly can use the NVMEM API. > Would the following be acceptable at the SoC node level > nvmem-cells: phandles to two OCOTP child nodes ocotp_cfg0 and ocotp_cfg1 > nvmem-cell-names: should contain string names "cfg0" and "cfg1" Regards, Sanchayan. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
