On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 10:25:06 +0200 Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2016, 17:17 +0100 schrieb Russell King - ARM > Linux: > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 05:29:43PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > > > @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ > > > phy-reset-gpios = <&gpio3 31 0>; > > > interrupts-extended = <&gpio1 6 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > > > <&intc 0 119 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > > + fsl,err006687-war-present; > > Why can't we just have the quirk detect the interrupts-extended property, which is not present on boards without the workaround. Wouldn't that be better? No dts change needed. > > war? Any reason not to spell it out, or use the more natural > > abbreviation "wa"? > > > Apparently I've read too many documents where WAR is the abbreviation > for workaround, so it felt completely natural to me. I agree that it > would make sense to just spell it out to avoid any confusion. > > Regards, > Lucas > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
