Hi, On Tuesday 07 June 2016 09:01 AM, Frank Wang wrote: > Hi Heiko, > > On 2016/6/7 10:59, Frank Wang wrote: >> Hi Heiko & Mark, >> >> On 2016/6/6 20:33, Heiko Stübner wrote: >>> Am Montag, 6. Juni 2016, 12:27:54 schrieb Mark Rutland: >>>> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:20:03PM +0800, Frank Wang wrote: >>>>> Signed-off-by: Frank Wang <frank.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> Changes in v3: >>>>> - Added 'clocks' and 'clock-names' optional properties. >>>>> - Specified 'otg-port' and 'host-port' as the sub-node name. >>>>> >>>>> Changes in v2: >>>>> - Changed vbus_host optional property from gpio to regulator. >>>>> - Specified vbus_otg-supply optional property. >>>>> - Specified otg_id and otg_bvalid property. >>>>> .../bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.txt | 60 >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+) >>>>> create mode 100644 >>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.txt> >>>>> diff --git >>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.txt >>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.txt new >>>>> file mode 100644 >>>>> index 0000000..0b4bbbb >>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.txt >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ >>>>> +ROCKCHIP USB2.0 PHY WITH INNO IP BLOCK >>>>> + >>>>> +Required properties (phy (parent) node): >>>>> + - compatible : should be one of the listed compatibles: >>>>> + * "rockchip,rk3366-usb2phy" >>>>> + * "rockchip,rk3399-usb2phy" >>>>> + - #clock-cells : should be 0. >>>>> + - clock-output-names : specify the 480m output clock name. >>>>> + >>>>> +Optional properties: >>>>> + - clocks : phandle + phy specifier pair, for the input clock of phy. >>>>> + - clock-names : input clock name of phy, must be "phyclk". >>>>> + - vbus_host-supply : phandle to a regulator that supplies host vbus. >>>>> + - vbus_otg-supply : phandle to a regulator that supplies otg vbus. >>>> Nit: s/_/-/ here. >>> Something I only stumbled over yesterday for the first time on my rk3288- >>> popmetal: The phy subnodes seem to be able to use a generic phy-supply >>> property from inside the phy-core itself, see: >>> >>> https://github.com/mmind/linux-rockchip/commit/93739f521fc65f44524b00c9aaf6db46bca94e02#diff-ddf3e45ebb753d6debf57022003a1a57R597 >>> >>> >>> for my WIP code for that other board. >>> >> >> Ah, good comments! I will try later, if it is practicable, I shall correct it >> into the next patches (patch v4). >> > > I am sorry to tell you that seems unworkable, because we have two sub-nodes > (phy-ports) in one parent-node (phy), > what is more, the 'phy-supply' property can only put into parent-node, I > believe it can not be differentiated types of ports. 'phy-supply' is a property of the phy node and not the 'phy-provider' node. So IMO this should work. What problem do you see? Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html