On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 10:16:12PM +0800, Xing Zheng wrote: > I refered to MTK's mt8173-rt5650-rt5514.txt on upstream, that compatible > name is "mediatek,mt8173-rt5650-rt5514". > Because our platform need to support 3 codecs (max98357a / da7219 / rt5514). > Perhaps, you maybe feel that name is too long? And, could you please tell me > what names would be better? > For example: "rk3399-composite-codecs" ? It should probably be three compatibles, one per CODEC, if the driver needs to handle each separately.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature