Hi, On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 12:34:35PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 02-06-16 20:16, Bin Liu wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:31:03PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>Some SoCs have a single phy-hw-block with multiple phys, this is > >>modelled by a single phy dts node, so we end up with multiple > >>controller nodes with a phys property pointing to the phy-node > >>of the otg-phy. > >> > >>Only one of these controllers typically is an otg controller, yet we > > > >Is it guaranteed that only one of them will be otg? > > I guess not, but if there are 2 then with my patch we are of no worse > then today, we will then pick the first otg controller. Whereas What if the first otg controller is not what we want? this patch does not solve the problem. I would think Kishon's suggestion in another email - seperate dt phy nodes - is a better option. > of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy currently is broken even on setups with > a shared phy dt-node and only 1 otg controller, which are quite > common. If that is the case, the model has to be changed. Otherwise, a single phy driver is unable to handle different operations from multiple controllers. Regards, -Bin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
