On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 01:18:44AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The pixel clock being only a divider of its parent clock, depending on the > > resolution, it's expected to change its parent rate. Add that flag so that > > the clock framework knows it. > > This should be squashed into the previous patch. Otherwise, the previous one > doesn't really fix things, and probably makes things worse as it assumes the > parent clock would be changed. Merged the two patches and applied, thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
