On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 07:22:46PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 03:21:46PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:20:47AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > > > By "That" are you referring to extending the standard for compatible > > > strings to the board level, or forcing consistent naming on the dts > > > files? > > > > A consistent file naming on both the dtb and dts files. > > It's time to knock the idea of naming the DT blobs after the compatible > string on its head as well. That's really not going to work. Just > leave the filenames as is, and move the problem into userspace to solve. Ack, I was working my way towards that anyway. > See - by doing this, you are building policy into the kernel build > system and potentially taking away choice from userspace. And this is my reason for dropping the idea. Thanks for clarifying it for me. I'll submit a non-RFC version that just copies the files without the name change. thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
