On Friday 15 November 2013 11:17 AM, Yuvaraj Kumar wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Monday 07 October 2013 07:35 PM, Yuvaraj Cd wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday 01 October 2013 12:03 PM, Yuvaraj Kumar C D wrote:
>>>>> This patch adds the sata phy driver for Exynos5250.Exynos5250 sata
>>>>> phy comprises of CMU and TRSV blocks which are of I2C register Map.
>>>>> So this patch also adds a i2c client driver, which is used configure
>>>>> the CMU and TRSV block of exynos5250 SATA PHY.
>>>>
>>>> Why not make the Exynos5250 sata phy as a i2c client driver instead?
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch incorporates the generic phy framework to deal with sata
>>>>> phy.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch depends on the below patch
>>>>> [1].drivers: phy: add generic PHY framework
>>>>> by Kishon Vijay Abraham I<kishon@xxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Girish K S <ks.giri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vasanth Ananthan <vasanth.a@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 6 +
>>>>> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>> drivers/phy/exynos/Kconfig | 5 +
>>>>> drivers/phy/exynos/Makefile | 5 +
>>>>> drivers/phy/exynos/exynos5250_phy_i2c.c | 53 +++++++
>>>>> drivers/phy/exynos/sata_phy_exynos5250.c | 248 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> drivers/phy/exynos/sata_phy_exynos5250.h | 33 ++++
>>>>> 7 files changed, 351 insertions(+)
>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/exynos/Kconfig
>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/exynos/Makefile
>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/exynos/exynos5250_phy_i2c.c
>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/exynos/sata_phy_exynos5250.c
>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/exynos/sata_phy_exynos5250.h
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>>>>> index 5f85909..ab3d1c6 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>>>>> @@ -11,3 +11,9 @@ menuconfig GENERIC_PHY
>>>>> devices present in the kernel. This layer will have the generic
>>>>> API by which phy drivers can create PHY using the phy framework and
>>>>> phy users can obtain reference to the PHY.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +if GENERIC_PHY
>>>>
>>>> NAK. Just select GENERIC_PHY from your driver Kconfig.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +source "drivers/phy/exynos/Kconfig"
>>>>> +
>>>>> +endif
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Makefile b/drivers/phy/Makefile
>>>>> index 9e9560f..e0223d7 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/phy/Makefile
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/Makefile
>>>>> @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@
>>>>> #
>>>>>
>>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY) += phy-core.o
>>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_SAMSUNG_SATA) += exynos/
>>>>
>>>> simply have phy-exynos5250 in drivers/phy.
>>> ok.
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/exynos/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/exynos/Kconfig
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 0000000..fa125fb
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/exynos/Kconfig
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
>>>>> +config PHY_SAMSUNG_SATA
>>>>> + tristate "Samsung Sata SerDes/PHY driver"
>>>>> + help
>>>>> + Support for Samsung sata SerDes/Phy found on Samsung
>>>>> + SoCs.
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/exynos/Makefile b/drivers/phy/exynos/Makefile
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 0000000..50dc7eb
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/exynos/Makefile
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
>>>>> +#
>>>>> +# Makefile for the exynos phy drivers.
>>>>> +#
>>>>> +ccflags-y := -Idrivers/phy/exynos
>>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_SAMSUNG_SATA) += sata_phy_exynos5250.o exynos5250_phy_i2c.o
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/exynos/exynos5250_phy_i2c.c b/drivers/phy/exynos/exynos5250_phy_i2c.c
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 0000000..9c75d3b
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/exynos/exynos5250_phy_i2c.c
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Samsung Electronics Co.Ltd
>>>>> + * Author:
>>>>> + * Yuvaraj C D <yuvaraj.cd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>>>>> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
>>>>> + * Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
>>>>> + * option) any later version.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>>> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
>>>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>>>> +#include "sata_phy_exynos5250.h"
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static int exynos_sata_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>>>> + const struct i2c_device_id *i2c_id)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + sataphy_attach_i2c_client(client);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + dev_info(&client->adapter->dev,
>>>>> + "attached %s into i2c adapter successfully\n",
>>>>> + client->name);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static int exynos_sata_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + dev_info(&client->adapter->dev,
>>>>> + "detached %s from i2c adapter successfully\n",
>>>>> + client->name);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static const struct i2c_device_id phy_i2c_device_match[] = {
>>>>> + { "sata-phy-i2c", 0 },
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, phy_i2c_device_match);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +struct i2c_driver sataphy_i2c_driver = {
>>>>> + .probe = exynos_sata_i2c_probe,
>>>>> + .id_table = phy_i2c_device_match,
>>>>> + .remove = exynos_sata_i2c_remove,
>>>>> + .driver = {
>>>>> + .name = "sata-phy-i2c",
>>>>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>>>> + .of_match_table = (void *)phy_i2c_device_match,
>>>>> + },
>>>>> +};
>>>>
>>>> As I just mentioned above, we can merge this driver with the below one.
>>> True, Initially it was merged.But already existing drivers of which
>>> are of similar to this kind were done in this way.
>>> Please refer /drivers/gpu/drm//exynos/exynos_hdmiphy.c
>>
>> Can you point to any discussions where it was decided to go with this approach?
> Sorry,what I meant is exynos_hdmiphy.c is already exist in the
> mainline with this approach.
>
> Initially it was merged on my local patches(Not upstreamed).But after
> referring to the
> exynos_hdmiphy.c driver and with lot of internal discussions ,it was
> decided to go with
I don't have any idea about the internal discussions whatever you had. IMO
Exynos5250 sata phy driver should be modelled as an i2c client driver if you
don't have a good reason to do otherwise.
Thanks
Kishon
> the already existing approach.
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
