On Monday 18 November 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 07:10:51PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Sunday 17 November 2013 17:18:03 Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > Simply using DT would help avoiding the awkward situation where a driver > > > of a device only works with one of the two description formats and not > > > the other. > > > Yes, but remember that Intel still have the problem on their embedded > > systems, and will want to solve them. > > Has it been confirmed that Intel are going with ACPI for their embedded > devices rather than SFI? That would be nice given how awful SFI is and > I have heard that before but I'm not sure I've seen anything official. Possibly not all of Intel agrees to that, but I think that's what I've heard from Darrent Hart and David Woodhouse. I doubt you can get an "official" confirmation about it. I also don't know if there is a follow-up for the Intel CE4100 that started using DT[1]. Arnd [1] arch/x86/platform/ce4100/falconfalls.dts -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
