Re: ACPI vs DT at runtime

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 07:10:51PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 17 November 2013 17:18:03 Stefano Stabellini wrote:

> > Simply using DT would help avoiding the awkward situation where a driver
> > of a device only works with one of the two description formats and not
> > the other.

> Yes, but remember that Intel still have the problem on their embedded
> systems, and will want to solve them.

Has it been confirmed that Intel are going with ACPI for their embedded
devices rather than SFI?  That would be nice given how awful SFI is and
I have heard that before but I'm not sure I've seen anything official.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux