Re: strange dtc errors after adding sram node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Stefan,

On Sa, 2016-04-23 at 10:18 +0200, Jörg Krause wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> On Sa, 2016-04-23 at 09:46 +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > i want to add an sram node to arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi.
> > According
> > to 
> > the reference manual [1] the On-Chip RAM is connected to AHB,
> > start 
> > address 0 and has a size of 128 KB.
> > 
> > So i modified the imx28.dtsi based on the patch below.
> > Unfortunately
> > the 
> > dtc give me some strang errors:
> > 
> > ERROR (duplicate_label): Duplicate label 'mac0' on 
> > /ahb@80080000/ethernet@800f0000 and /ahb@00000000/ethernet@800f0000
> > ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
> > 
> > What's wrong with my patch or does it reveal another issue?
> > 
> > Regards
> > Stefan
> > 
> > [1] - http://cache.freescale.com/files/dsp/doc/ref_manual/MCIMX28RM
> > .p
> > df
> > i.MX28 Applications Processor Reference Manual, Rev. 2, 08/2013
> > Chapter 4.1 Memory Map Overview
> > 
> > -------------------------->8---------------------------------------
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi
> > @@ -1311,13 +1311,18 @@
> >   		};
> >   	};
> > 
> > -	ahb@80080000 {
> > +	ahb@00000000 {
> >   		compatible = "simple-bus";
> >   		#address-cells = <1>;
> >   		#size-cells = <1>;
> > -		reg = <0x80080000 0x80000>;
> > +		reg = <0x00000000 0x20000>, <0x80080000 0x80000>;
> >   		ranges;
> > 
> > +		ocram: sram@00000000 {
> > +			compatible = "mmio-sram";
> > +			reg = <0x00000000 0x20000>;
> > +		};
> > +
> >   		usb0: usb@80080000 {
> >   			compatible = "fsl,imx28-usb", "fsl,imx27-
> > usb";
> >   			reg = <0x80080000 0x10000>;
> 
> Follwing the address map for the i.MX28 (p. 125ff) the AHB is mapped
> to
> different start addresses:
> 
> Bus	MNEMONIC	START ADDRESS
> --------------------------------------
> AHB	OCRAM 		0x00000000
> AHB	USBCTRL0	0x80080000
> AHB	OCROM		0xC0000000
> 
> So instead of replacing ahb@80080000 by ahb@00000000 a new node
> should
> be created. However, I am not sure if this is really necessary, I
> haven't seen it for all device trees using "mmio-sram".

Sorry, for not looking carefully enough at your patch. Haven't seen you
adjusted the 'reg' property. I tried with an additional ahb@00000000 no
de and this did work.

So, there is really something odd here...

Best regards
Jörg Krause
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux