On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 13:54:34 +0300 Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 15/04/16 13:09, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > Hi Roger, > > > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:34:04 +0300 > > Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Tony & Boris, > >> > >> On 14/04/16 00:25, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >>> * Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> [160407 03:10]: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> As this series has cross dependency between omap and mtd subsystems, > >>>> I'll set up a immutable branch which omap-soc and l2-mtd must > >>>> merge in together to avoid any conflicts/breakage during integration. > >>>> > >>>> Brian has acked all mtd patches. Tony needs to give his Ack for the > >>>> gpmc driver part and then I can provide the immutable branch. > >>> > >>> Looks good to me, please feel free to add: > >>> > >>> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >> > >> I've added Tony and Rob's Acked-by tags and pushed the patches at the > >> below PULL request. > >> > >> Please take this into omap-soc and l2-mtd trees. Thanks. > > > > I Pulled this branch into nand/next and had to resolve a few conflicts > > (as you may have noticed, a few other reworks in the NAND and MTD layer > > have been merged in the meantime). > > OK. I'm not sure how well this will play when this merges into liunx-next > via the omap-soc tree. > > Instead, can you please create a non-mutable nand/base for me (which could be > today's nand/next) and I can base my branch on that and Tony can use my > branch without causing any merge-conflict in linux-next? You want those patches to go through the arm-soc tree, right? I'm not an expert, but I'd say that Tony should take those patches and provide an immutable branch I can pull into nand/next. -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
