Hello, On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:01:22 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > In fact, the more I think of it, the less I find encoding the clock > output names in the DT to be useful for such a driver. For generic > clock drivers, it makes complete sense, but here the driver is really > tied to the specific system controller of that SoC, so the clock names > will not change. My bad: there will be two instances of the CP110 system controller, one for the master CP110 and one for the slave CP110. So having the possibility of setting the clock names in the DT is actually a good thing, so I'll keep it. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
