* Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> [160412 06:56]: > On 04/11/2016 08:40 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Nice to see this moving along :) > > > >* Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> [160411 01:20]: > >> > >>The ordering on this set is kind of tricky to avoid any boot issues, > >>and it still currently causes a boot breakage between the DTS data > >>introduction and removal of hwmod data; this generates duplicate > >>entries for clocks which is prone to cause issues (both DT and hwmod > >>have the same entries in place under the hwmod data is removed.) I > >>didn't quite figure out a good way to avoid this, and could use some > >>guidance here. Shall we squash the DT + hwmod data patches together? > >>This avoids the boot breakage but creates pretty large patches. Also, > >>AMx3xx data needs to be grouped together as part of their data is > >>re-used commonly by both SoCs. > > > >How about use clocks from dts if clocks property is defined? Otherwise > >fall back to the old static data. Then drop the static data later on > >with follow up patches. > > The underlying issue is the hardcoded names of hwmod clocks within hwmod > data. I think I figured out a fix for this, I am adding a few patches to > this series to lookup main_clk based on the hwmod name itself. This allows > re-directing the main_clk to the DT module clock in case one is available > for the hwmod. The bisect issues seem to be gone with this also, I need to > cleanup the patches a bit and re-post. OK yes generated names sounds like a good solution to support the old way of doing things. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
