On 04/04/2016 03:45 AM, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
I'm trying to move on with my USB2.0 patch set because my projects is blocked waiting for it. I've seen your PHY patch but it contains only on/off functions and does not handle the clocks, which IMHO should be moved to the PHY driver as well if we decided to do it properly.
Have a closer look at my (v3) patchset. It does handle clocks in the phy driver. The clocks themselves are implemented in mach-davinici similar to the rest of the SoC clocks and the phy driver uses clk_get(), clk_prepare_enable(), etc.
How shall we proceed if both of us are working on the same piece of code?
I have never submitted patches for the Linux kernel before last month, so I have not yet experienced the whole process of getting a patch accepted. So, I don't know an answer to this question.
Perhaps someone with more experience can offer advice? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
