Hi Rob, 2016-03-22 17:11 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hi guys, > > I will fix typo issues (s/vesrion/version and ethernet @). > > Concerning compatible string. For sure "snps,dwmac-3.50a" string is > not used inside glue driver. > I perfere to keep it for information but if you really want that I > remove it I will not block ;) > > 2016-03-21 16:36 GMT+01:00 Joachim Eastwood <manabian@xxxxxxxxx>: >> On 21 March 2016 at 13:40, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:00:22AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Alexandre TORGUE >>>> <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> > +- clocks: Must contain a phandle for each entry in clock-names. >>>> > +- clock-names: Should be "stmmaceth" for the host clock. >>> > We can remove host clock (stmmac eth) entry here and refer to > stmmac.txt binding for common entry > >>> This doesn't sound like the clock input signal name... >>> >>>> > + Should be "tx-clk" for the MAC TX clock. >>>> > + Should be "rx-clk" for the MAC RX clock. >>> >>> How can other DWMAC blocks not have these clocks? The glue can't really >>> add these clocks. It could combine them into one or a new version of >>> DWMAC could have a different number of clock inputs. So if there is >>> variation here, then some of the bindings are probably wrong. I guess >>> the only change I'm suggesting is possibly moving these into common >>> binding doc. >> >> The LPC18xx implementation probably have these clocks as well but the >> LPC1850 user manual only documents the main clock. Someone with access >> to the IP block doc from Synopsys should be able to check which clocks >> the MAC really needs. >> >> Rockchip bindings have two clocks named "mac_clk_rx" and "mac_clk_tx". >> These are probably the same as stm32 needs so maybe use these names >> and move them into the main doc and update the rockchip binding. >> > I think we can use same name. But I have a doubt on moving it in a > common bindings (maybe I don't well understood). When you say "common > binding file" is it "stmmac.txt" binding ? If yes does it mean that we > have to control it inside stmmac driver (no more in glue) ? In this > case those clocks will become "required" for stm32 and rockship but > not for others chip. It could create confusion? A gentle ping. Can you give me your feedback please ? I will send next patchset version according to your answer. Thanks in advance Alex > > Best regards > > Alex > >> >> regards, >> Joachim Eastwood -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
