On 1 April 2016 at 18:07, Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 07:11:24PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> This will allow drivers handle ECC properly. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 6 +++++- >> include/linux/mtd/nand.h | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c >> index f2c8ff3..ef977f3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c >> @@ -3979,7 +3979,7 @@ ident_done: >> static int nand_dt_init(struct nand_chip *chip) >> { >> struct device_node *dn = nand_get_flash_node(chip); >> - int ecc_mode, ecc_strength, ecc_step; >> + int ecc_mode, ecc_algo, ecc_strength, ecc_step; >> >> if (!dn) >> return 0; >> @@ -3991,6 +3991,7 @@ static int nand_dt_init(struct nand_chip *chip) >> chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH; >> >> ecc_mode = of_get_nand_ecc_mode(dn); >> + ecc_algo = of_get_nand_ecc_algo(dn); >> ecc_strength = of_get_nand_ecc_strength(dn); >> ecc_step = of_get_nand_ecc_step_size(dn); >> >> @@ -4003,6 +4004,9 @@ static int nand_dt_init(struct nand_chip *chip) >> if (ecc_mode >= 0) >> chip->ecc.mode = ecc_mode; >> >> + if (ecc_algo >= 0) >> + chip->ecc.algo = ecc_algo; >> + > > While this might appear to handle the absence of the nand-ecc-algo > property correctly, this isn't safe. This means that any existing DT > without the property will get treated as Hamming ECC. Perhaps we need > the enum to have a 0 value of 'NAND_ECC_ALGO_UNKNOWN' or something like > that? You're commenting on an old series. If you take a look at: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/601180/ that also got applied to the: https://github.com/linux-nand/linux/commits/nand/next repo, you'll see we have NAND_ECC_UNKNOWN there. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html