Le 23/03/2016 14:47, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : > On 23/03/2016 at 12:22:49 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote : >> Le 18/03/2016 11:34, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : >>> On 18/03/2016 at 08:21:19 +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote : >>>> So far, the CIDR and EXID registers were in the DBGU interface. This device >>>> has disappeared with the SAMA5D2 family. These registers are exposed >>>> through a new device called chipid. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> [nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx: remove useless warnings] >>> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>>> --- >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt | 4 ++ >>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++----- >> >> We may need to split this patch in 2 for going through separate arm-soc >> branches: what do you think Alexandre? >> > > I think the patch can go in as it is now, the documentation being in > line with the code. Okay: patches 1 & 2 in the "soc" branch. patch 3 in the "dt" branch. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
