On 2016/3/26 1:15, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 04:05:49PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> > From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > ACPI 6.0 introduces a new table STAO to list the devices which are used
>> > by Xen and can't be used by Dom0. On Xen virtual platforms, the physical
>> > UART is used by Xen. So here it hides UART from Dom0.
>> >
>> > CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:ACPI)
>> > CC: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:ACPI)
>> > CC: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:ACPI)
>> > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>> > index 5f28cf7..5420cc5 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>> > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(acpi_scan_handlers_list);
>> > DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_device_lock);
>> > LIST_HEAD(acpi_wakeup_device_list);
>> > static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_hp_context_lock);
>> > +static u64 spcr_uart_addr;
>> >
>> > struct acpi_dep_data {
>> > struct list_head node;
>> > @@ -1453,6 +1454,41 @@ static int acpi_add_single_object(struct acpi_device **child,
>> > return 0;
>> > }
>> >
>> > +static acpi_status acpi_get_resource_memory(struct acpi_resource *ares,
>> > + void *context)
>> > +{
>> > + struct resource *res = context;
>> > +
>> > + if (acpi_dev_resource_memory(ares, res))
>> > + return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
>> > +
>> > + return AE_OK;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static bool acpi_device_should_be_hidden(acpi_handle handle)
>> > +{
>> > + acpi_status status;
>> > + struct resource res;
>> > +
>> > + /* Check if it should ignore the UART device */
>> > + if (spcr_uart_addr != 0) {
>> > + if (!acpi_has_method(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS))
>> > + return false;
>> > +
>> > + status = acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
>> > + acpi_get_resource_memory, &res);
>> > + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> > + return false;
>> > +
>> > + if (res.start == spcr_uart_addr) {
>> > + printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "The UART device in SPCR table will be hidden\n");
> Can we at least print out the ACPI device path and address here for
> debugging purposes? IMHO, kernel messages that contain only static
> text are always dubious. There's almost always a useful address, IRQ,
> return value, etc., that could be included.
>
Ok, I'll add the device address in the message and update this patch.
Thanks,
--
Shannon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
