Hi Dinh, On 03/08/2016 08:50 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On 03/07/2016 01:43 PM, tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Add the device tree entries needed to support the Altera L2 cache EDAC on the Arria10 chip. Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- v2 Match register value (l2-ecc@ffd06010) --- arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10.dtsi index cce9e50..44aeb3f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10.dtsi @@ -599,6 +599,20 @@ reg = <0xffe00000 0x40000>; }; + eccmgr: eccmgr@ffd06090 { + compatible = "altr,socfpga-ecc-manager"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + ranges; + + l2-ecc@ffd06010 { + compatible = "altr,socfpga-a10-l2-ecc"; + reg = <0xffd06010 0x4>; + interrupts = <0 2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, + <0 0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + }; + }; +Just checking if these addresses are correct. The eccmgr is at 0xffd06090, but the l2-ecc is at 0xffd06010? I would have thought from the placement the l2-ecc address would be inside the eccmgr's address? Dinh
Yes, this is confusing and I'll clarify/reorganize in the next series. The eccmgr is pointing to the ECC IRQ mask bits. These registers and the L2 ECC registers are organized in different areas within the system manager.
I'm actually redoing the series since the Arria10 IRQ handling is significantly different.
Since this change will affect the bindings and dti (the eccmgr will have the IRQs), please disregard this series.
Sorry for the noise. Thor -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
