On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 02:08:37PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This adds fairly standard device tree bindings for the STMPE
> PWM found in STMPE24xx multi-purpose expanders.
>
> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/st,stmpe-pwm.txt | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/st,stmpe-pwm.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/st,stmpe-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/st,stmpe-pwm.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c8b53f39ae31
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/st,stmpe-pwm.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +== ST STMPE PWM controller ==
> +
> +This is a PWM block embedded in the ST Microelectronics STMPE
> +(ST Multi-Purpose Expander) chips. The PWM is registered as a
> +subdevices of the STMPE MFD device.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: should be:
> + - "st,stmpe-pwm"
> +- #pwm-cells: should be 2. See pwm.txt in this directory for a description of
> + the cells format.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +stmpe1_pwm0: stmpe_pwm {
Shouldn't the node name simply be "pwm"? stmpe_pwm is kind of redundant
given that this is to be embedded in an MFD node that will, presumably,
be called stmpe.
Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
