Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based on platform behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Wednesday 02 March 2016 10:05 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:05:26AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Wednesday 02 March 2016 09:08 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
You're not trying to scale the value here, you're trying to replace the
value because the PMIC is incapable of delivering the advertised ramp
rate.  Trying to express this as a multiple of the advertised ramp rate
is just adding complexity.
So should we provide absolute ramp value here for platform specific?
Yes, otherwise if the PMIC vendor respecifies their ramp rates to
reflect reality and the driver is updated then your DT will be broken.

Then can we have other member for pmic ramp time register configuration via DT. So measured value on platform will be existing ramp-delay and the value which will be configured in PMIC will be via pmic-ramp-delay if provided otherwise use ramp-delay.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux