On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 20:29:17 +0200
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@xxxxxx> wrote:
> I understand the short comings of simple-card and it's binding. However,
> the binding is documented and it is feasible to extract the audio
> connections from a simple-card binding too. In fact it models the I2S
> connections better than straight out of the box graph binding. Actually
> a graph is not the best way describe an i2s-bus with multiple DAIs
> (codec or CPU) connected to it.
I still don't understand your problem. You want something like:
audio-ports = < TDA998x_SPDIF 0x04
TDA998x_I2S 0x03>;
and the graph definition would be:
port@03 {
reg = <0x03>;
port-type = "audio-i2s";
...
};
port@04 {
reg = <0x04>;
port-type = "audio-spdif";
...
};
Apart the syntax, I don't really see the difference.
--
Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
