On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 20:14 +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote: > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 18:46 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 19:25 +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote: > > > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 13:06 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 00:26 +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote: > > So, but if you support only fixed rates, why do you care about > > BOTHER > > at all? > > If BOTHER is defined, tty_termios_baud_rate() > and tty_termios_encode_baud_rate() allow non-standard baud rates. I > should clear it from c_cflag to indicate I don't support it. > > > > > > > > > > I think you can call this unconditionally together with case > > > > > 115200. > > > > > > The calls are orthogonal. This one deals with the case when > > > BOTHER > > > is > > > defined and set, and we have non-zero rate with BOTHER, but we > > > have > > > zero rate after BOTHER is cleared. So we set 9600 as a sane > > > default > > > speed. Maybe you just set a baud rate nearest to the one from the table in case of BOTHER? In that case perhaps you have to supply +-1 to the range. That's why I asked about uart_get_baud_rate(). Maybe this flow will work for you if (BOTHER) clear BOTHER call uart_get_baud_rate() ? > The warning seems to be the result of initializing a spinlock with > zero. Spinlocks are intentionally obfuscated, but I didn't > investigate > further. > > > $ git grep -n 'struct .* = {0};' | wc -l > > 338 > > > > $ git grep -n 'struct .* = { \?0 \?};' | wc -l > > 550 > > > > ( '… = { 0 };' included) > > The first structure member is most likely not a spinlock in those > cases. Hmm... Interesting. On one hand the poison is reasonable, on the other we often do a memset() or {0} on structures, i.o.w. assign 0 as initial value until spinlock_init(). Arnd, what do you think about this (and similar) case(s)? -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html