Le 01/03/2016 12:29, Romain Izard a écrit : > Hi Nicolas, > > 2016-03-01 11:27 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>: >> Le 01/02/2016 11:25, Romain Izard a écrit : >>> The NAND Flash controller for SAMA5D2 has small differences that make >>> it impossible to use the existing driver for SAMA5D3. This patchset >>> uses the device tree's compatible string to get those differences, >>> and the code is slightly modified to handle them. >>> >>> Base on linux-mtd-next, commit >>> 15c0be7bec002f9a529dd0966d0db96dde176fd0 >>> >>> See previous revisions to apply on the Atmel Linux 4.1 branch. >>> >>> Compile tested for sama5_defconfig, and tested on SAMA5D3xek as there >>> is no existing SAMA5D2 board with NAND Flash memory (yet). >> >> Brian, >> >> Hi, do we need to resend this series with all the tags collected (aka >> ping ;-)) ? >> > > A v4 has already been sent, and Brian has picked patches 1-4, as seen > in: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/155864/ Ok, I forget it and it was in another mailbox on my side: sorry for the noise... > For patch #5, it is the update for the sama5d2.dtsi to describe the > NAND controller. Perhaps you can take it on your tree for 4.6, it > won't change anything until a board needs it, either Atmel's SAMA5D2 PTC > or another one. Absolutely. As I am collecting this material, it makes perfect sense to add it to our at91-4.6-dt branch. Thanks for the help Romain! Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
