On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:43:15AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > Yes there are documentation and helpers I looked into, but to the best of my > limited knowledge not for the gate + dual-rate case. Then you jump to > complicated configurations combining multiple base clocks that don't really > make sense here. After one frustrating day of trying to wrap 100 lines of > code into the clock framework I gave up and kept the simple custom driver. > There is a single client for this clock so I don't quite see the > benefits/ROI of mapping a simple piece of hardware with a complex model. If the helpers aren't fitting your needs then surely just writing a simple driver with set rate and enable callbacks isn't going to be too hard? The wm831x driver was pretty trivial to write and seems to be on a similar order of complexity to this.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
