On 02/23/2016 02:26 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 05:58:22PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attempt to get the memory and CPU NUMA node via of_numa. If that
fails, default the dummy NUMA node and map all memory and CPUs to node
0.
Tested-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 26 +++
arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h | 12 ++
arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h | 45 +++++
arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 10 +
arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 10 +
arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 4 +
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 4 +
arch/arm64/mm/Makefile | 1 +
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 34 +++-
arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 1 +
arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 403 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
11 files changed, 545 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
[...]
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a0de9e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+#ifndef __ASM_MMZONE_H
+#define __ASM_MMZONE_H
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+
+#include <asm/numa.h>
+
+extern struct pglist_data *node_data[];
+#define NODE_DATA(nid) (node_data[(nid)])
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
+#endif /* __ASM_MMZONE_H */
What happened to the patch cleaning this up in generic code?
As per 0/5 :
v11:
- Dropped cleanup patches for other architectures, they will be
submitted as a separate set after more testing.
The "cleanup patches" were not building on x86, which is a bit of a
problem. I believe I have corrected that issue, but would like to do
a little more build testing on all the other architectures that are
effected.
I probably should have supplied more detail as to my plan of attack
for these. To make review more manageable, I would like to consider
the arm64 patches separately. The parties interested in getting arm64
NUMA working can proceed without waiting for the cleanups to be fully
tested and acknowledged. I am working on testing the cleanups on each
architecture touched, and will resubmit them as a separate patch set
this week. I think splitting them like this will streamline the
process of getting to the eventual goal of having both arm64 NUMA and
the cleanups merged.
David.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
