Re: breaking DT compatibility (was: Re: [PATCH v4] clk: sunxi: Refactor A31 PLL6 so that it can be reused)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: breaking DT compatibility (was: Re: [PATCH v4] clk: sunxi: Refactor A31 PLL6 so that it can be reused)
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:51:58 +0100
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@xxxxxxxxx>, Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@xxxxxxx>, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>, Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>, Jens Kuske <jenskuske@xxxxxxxxx>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20160211100048.GK31506@lukather>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:00:48AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> None of our existing users ever complained.

Note to self:

   Avoid choosing this SoC for new projects.  The maintainers do not
   care about the end users.

Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: breaking DT compatibility
  - From: Andre Przywara

References:
- Re: [PATCH v4] clk: sunxi: Refactor A31 PLL6 so that it can be reused
  - From: Andre Przywara
- breaking DT compatibility (was: Re: [PATCH v4] clk: sunxi: Refactor A31 PLL6 so that it can be reused)
  - From: Andre Przywara
- Re: breaking DT compatibility (was: Re: [PATCH v4] clk: sunxi: Refactor A31 PLL6 so that it can be reused)
  - From: Rob Herring
- Re: breaking DT compatibility (was: Re: [PATCH v4] clk: sunxi: Refactor A31 PLL6 so that it can be reused)
  - From: Maxime Ripard
- Re: breaking DT compatibility (was: Re: [PATCH v4] clk: sunxi: Refactor A31 PLL6 so that it can be reused)
  - From: Mark Rutland
- Re: breaking DT compatibility (was: Re: [PATCH v4] clk: sunxi: Refactor A31 PLL6 so that it can be reused)
  - From: Maxime Ripard

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt/bindings: Add binding for the DA8xx MUSB driver
Previous by thread: Re: breaking DT compatibility (was: Re: [PATCH v4] clk: sunxi: Refactor A31 PLL6 so that it can be reused)
Next by thread: Re: breaking DT compatibility
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Device Tree Compilter] [Device Tree Spec] [Linux Driver Backports] [Video for Linux] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux PCI Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86] [Yosemite Backpacking]