Hi Rob, Ping on this. Have you seen my comments below? I am trying to understand if fixing the smaller comments discussed below would allow this patch-set to be accepted so we at least have a working support as with previous kernels? Or do we basically drop support for ti_st until it is implemented as a slave device? Can you please let me know your thoughts? Best Regards, Eyal > -----Original Message----- > From: Reizer, Eyal > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2016 9:57 AM > To: 'Rob Herring' > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; pawel.moll@xxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; > ijc+devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tony@xxxxxxxxxxx; > linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Balbi, Felipe > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] ti-st: use device handles and add device tree binding > > Sorry for the delayed response. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rob Herring [mailto:robh@xxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 8:36 PM > > To: Reizer, Eyal > > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm- > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; pawel.moll@xxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; > > ijc+devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tony@xxxxxxxxxxx; > > linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ti-st: use device handles and add device tree > > binding > > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:38:29AM +0000, Reizer, Eyal wrote: > > > - Add support for getting the platform data which includes the uart > > > used and gpio pin used for enable from device tree. > > > > > > - Fix the implementation for using device handle for the uart and > > > gpiod for the enable pin, instead of device name (as string) used > > > for the uart and pio number which are both bad practice. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eyal Reizer <eyalr@xxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/ti-st.txt | 42 ++++++ > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c | 16 ++- > > > drivers/misc/ti-st/st_kim.c | 159 ++++++++++++++++------ > > > drivers/misc/ti-st/st_ll.c | 16 ++- > > > include/linux/ti_wilink_st.h | 13 +- > > > > I'd suggest you look at commit c0bd1b9e58959c5 (Revert "ti-st: add > > device tree support") first. > > > > > 5 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) create mode > > > 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/ti-st.txt > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/ti-st.txt > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/ti-st.txt > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..4490da6 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/ti-st.txt > > > @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ > > > +TI Wilink 6/7/8 (wl12xx/wl18xx) Shared transport driver > > > > Bindings shouldn't be describing drivers... > > > > OK, understood > > > > + > > > +TI’s Wireless Connectivity chips support Bluetooth (BT), WiFi, and > > > +GPS technology cores in a single die. > > > + > > > +Such a multi-core combo chip will be interfaced to the application > > > +processor using a single physical port (like UART). > > > + > > > +Shared Transport (ST) software enables BT and GPS protocols or > > > +software components to interact with their respective cores over > > > +single > > physical port. > > > +ST uses logical channels, over physical transport, to communicate > > > +with individual cores. > > > + > > > +Logical channels 1, 2, 3, and 4 are used for BT packets, channel 8 > > > +for FM, channel 9 for GPS and channels 30, 31, 32, and 33 are used > > > +for Chip Power Management (PM). > > > > All this is irrelevant for a binding. > > > > OK, understood > > > > + > > > +This node provides properties for passing parameters to the ti > > > +shared transport driver. > > > + > > > +Required properties: > > > + - compatible: should be the following: > > > + * "kim" - ti-st parameters > > > > Who is kim? Certainly not a description of a h/w block. > > Not sure about the origin of this name but according to the following link: > http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Shared_Transport_Driver > KIM is "Kernel Initialization Manager" that enables communication with BT and > GPS cores. > > > > > > + > > > +Optional properties: > > > + - nshutdown-gpios : specifies attributes for gpio ping used for enabling > > > + the bluetooth,gps and FM sub systems > > > + - serial-device : the phandle for the phisical uart used for interacting > > > + with the wilink device > > > > There have been multiple discussions on serial slave devices recently. > > I'm not going to accept any device binding without a common uart slave > > device binding first. > > > > Perhaps I am reading it wrong but I think this is a different discussion. > The shared transport driver is already in the kernel for pretty long time. > AFAIK the original author is not around to maintain it. > Currently it is useless as no bindings exist for it and all customers I have seen > using ti_st that upgrade to newer kernels have broken support and have to > manually patch the kernel for adding bindings for it. > > Having a new uart slave device that may provide similar functionality is a > different discussion as it would require a total different implementation. > But what do we do now with the implementation that is already there. > Don't we want it to work and at least have working bindings for it? > > > > + - flow_cntrl : Indicates if uart flow control is used > > > + - flow_cntrl : uart baud rate in BPS > > > > Typo here, but these should be part of a common serial slave binding. > > > > Don't use '_' in property names. > > > > Will fix this > > > > + > > > +Example: > > > + > > > +kim { > > > + compatible = "kim"; > > > + nshutdown-gpios = <&gpio3 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > > + serial-device = <&uart1>; > > > + flow_cntrl = <1>; > > > + flow_cntrl = <3000000>; > > > +}; > > > + > > Best Regards, > Eyal ��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
