Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: ltc3589: make IRQ optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi,

On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:41:23 +0000 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:37:31PM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:26:10 +0000 Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > You're not just making the interrupt optional, you are also implementing
> > > polling support.  That's really unusual and there's no clear reason for
> 
> > Any suggestions how to handle this case in a more sensible way?
> 
> The above, for example - make the interrupt optional.
>
This will make it impossible to notify the system about
overtemperature (and undervoltage).
I implemented polling to be able to get at least overtemperature
warnings.
(Undervoltage cannot be handled sensibly without interrupt anyway)


Lothar Waßmann
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux