On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:37:31PM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:26:10 +0000 Mark Brown wrote: > > You're not just making the interrupt optional, you are also implementing > > polling support. That's really unusual and there's no clear reason for > Any suggestions how to handle this case in a more sensible way? The above, for example - make the interrupt optional.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
